On cross-examination, what should the expert witness do when they do not understand the question?

In the context of an expert witness during cross-examination, it is crucial for the integrity of their testimony to ensure clarity and comprehension regarding the questions posed. When an expert witness does not understand a question, asking for it to be repeated is the most appropriate course of action.

This approach serves several important purposes. First, it allows the witness to fully understand what is being asked, which is essential for providing accurate and relevant information. Clear communication is key in a legal setting, and misunderstanding a question could lead to incorrect or misleading responses. Additionally, requesting clarification demonstrates professionalism and diligence, reinforcing the credibility of the witness. It shows that the witness is attentive and committed to providing precise and informed testimony, rather than guessing or offering generalized statements that could compromise the quality of their expertise.

In contrast, ignoring the question would not only hinder the effectiveness of the testimony but could also lead to potential implications of evasiveness or lack of engagement. Guessing the answer could also produce unreliable information, which might be detrimental to the case at hand. Providing a generalized answer might not adequately address the specific inquiry of the question, leading to ambiguity and increased potential for misunderstanding. Thus, seeking clarification through repetition of the question is the best practice for an expert witness during cross-examination