During direct examination, what should be done after summarizing the work prepared?

After summarizing the work prepared during direct examination, it is essential to explain the procedures and assumptions utilized. This step is crucial as it provides the court with a clear understanding of how the analysis was conducted, ensuring that all aspects of the financial data or findings are transparent and well-founded. By detailing the procedures and assumptions, the expert witness can substantiate their conclusions, establishing credibility and allowing the judge or jury to grasp the rationale behind the analysis.

This explanation also serves to address any potential gaps in understanding that could arise from the summary alone, ensuring that all parties involved in the case comprehend the methodologies applied. This clarity is vital in a divorce financial analysis context, where financial decisions based on the assessment can significantly impact both parties.

The other options do not follow immediately after summarizing the work. For instance, admitting exhibits to the court is typically done after the witness has established the relevance of their testimony but is not the immediate procedural next step. Answering questions from opposing counsel occurs later in the examination process, mainly during cross-examination, not right after summarizing the work. Lastly, submitting a written report often happens before or after oral testimony rather than immediately following a summary during direct examination. Therefore, providing an explanation of procedures and assumptions aligns precisely with